Many folks are declaring his loss
in Iowa as the beginning of the end, in part because his brand is
"winning." The difficulty here is that we've never had a candidate like
him, so guessing what his supporters will do is tough. My own view is
that this "winning" thing is a distraction.
Trump's supporters
are not society's winners. They're anxious and angry, and some are
marginalized. They feel the political system has failed; whatever their
individual fears (immigrants, loss of status, paycheck problems, etc),
the GOP has been failing them for 20 years. They back Trump because he
is NOT a typical Republican--he's not the latest in a series of
standard-issue pols who will talk conservatism and then go to DC for
business as usual.
It just doesn't make any sense to me that a
second place finish in Iowa changes anything for these voters. Rubio and
Cruz are very clearly creatures of government. Trump voters are going
to jump on their bandwagon just because Trump didn't "win?" That would
suggest a very shallow level of engagement.
Maybe so. I
certainly don't hang out with folks who have been magnetized by Trump.
But for seven months, pundits and the media have underestimated the true
support Trump has had. This seems like yet another example of their
failure to get Trump's appeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment